Ir al contenido
FPD.DEV FPD.DEVThe Future of Display & Systems Development
  • Inicio
  • Products
  • Cursos
  • Partners
  • Contáctenos
  • Identificarse
  • 0
  • 0
FPD.DEV
  • 0
  • 0
    • Inicio
    • Products
    • Cursos
    • Partners

  • FPD.DEV
    The Future of Display Development

    Notices:   
    1.   Courses are undergoing maintenance.  Enrolled courses are unaffected.

  • Identificarse
  • Contáctenos
  1. Cursos
  2. DO-160 Display Qualification: Components, Systems and Installation
  3. 05 — Turn display functions into measurable acceptance criteria
Navegación
Inicio └DO-160 Display Qualification: Components, Systems and Installation └05 — Turn display functions into measurable acceptance criteria

DO-160 Display Qualification: Components, Systems and Installation

0 %

Completado

Contenido del curso
  • 01 — Public foundations and selected preview chapters
    • 00 — Start here: build a defensible display qualification plan
    • 01 — Public chapter: component, system and installed boundaries
    • 02 — Public chapter: read a qualification claim critically
    • 03 — Public chapter: the complete environmental test suite
    • 04 — Public chapter: temperature limits, ramp rates and decompression
  • 02 — Requirements and climatic exposures
    • 05 — Turn display functions into measurable acceptance criteria
    • 06 — Temperature and altitude: construct the procedure
    • 07 — Temperature variation: 5 and 10 °C per minute in practice
    • 08 — Pressure, altitude and rapid decompression
    • 09 — Humidity, water and fluids: qualify the exposed assembly
    • 10 — Salt spray, fungus, sand and dust
  • 03 — Mechanical and special environments
    • 11 — Shock and vibration: the fixture is part of the argument
    • 12 — Explosion proofness, icing and fire applicability
  • 04 — Power, EMC, lightning and ESD
    • 13 — Aircraft power: qualify the complete input path
    • 14 — EMC: emissions and susceptibility are different evidence
    • 15 — Lightning: connect equipment levels to the aircraft installation
    • 16 — Electrostatic discharge and accessible display surfaces
  • 05 — Installation and qualification planning
    • 17 — Installed display verification and human viewing conditions
    • 18 — Build the environmental qualification matrix
  • 06 — Contracts, changes and lifecycle
    • 19 — Specify the testing contract and supplier deliverables
    • 20 — Changes, anomalies, retests and qualification credit
    • 21 — Tests beyond DO-160 and the production boundary
  • 07 — Capstone, references and assessment
    • 22 — Capstone: plan qualification for a complete aircraft display
    • 23 — Reference shelf and practical worksheets
    • 24 — Knowledge check: apply the qualification principles 10 xp

05 — Turn display functions into measurable acceptance criteria

Anterior Siguiente
Fullscreen Share Forum

DO-160 Display Qualification | A-P02 — Draft / Not Released

Learning objective: Write criteria that detect misleading, frozen or degraded display behavior.

Display test pattern containing a zone plate, grayscale ramp, color patches and reference photographs.
A display test pattern combines fine spatial detail, gray levels and color patches. It illustrates why acceptance criteria should specify the displayed content and observation method. This scaled course preview is not a calibrated target or an acceptance test; qualification uses controlled source pixels, viewing conditions and suitable instruments.
Image: AlbertCahalan (Wikimedia Commons: AlbertCahalan~commonswiki) · Zone plate boys · CC BY-SA 3.0. Source image retained unchanged; displayed at reduced size.

Define what the display must do during the test

“The unit still works” is too weak an acceptance criterion. A screen can remain illuminated while showing stale information, losing a warning color or generating an unintended touch command.

The display performance specification should define measurable requirements for the functions being qualified. Useful groups include:

  • Optical performance: luminance, contrast under stated illumination, color, uniformity, viewing range, dimming, defects and image retention where relevant.
  • Dynamic behavior: startup, response time, refresh artifacts, flicker, image continuity, data age and latency at the display boundary.
  • Controls: touch accuracy, missed or false inputs, physical-control operation and feedback.
  • Integrity and recovery: validity indications, detection of frozen or corrupt images, mode retention, permitted interruptions, recovery time and any permitted operator action.
  • Physical condition: cracks, delamination, leakage, loose hardware, corrosion, insulation and retention, using limits appropriate to the test.

Define the measurement setup as carefully as the number: pattern and image loading, backlight setting, temperature, stabilization, illumination direction and level, viewing angle, instrument geometry, uncertainty and observation interval. A room-temperature center-screen measurement cannot establish performance throughout the viewing envelope at an environmental extreme.

For transport-airplane flight deck displays, FAA AC 25-11B discusses readability, luminance, contrast, color, dynamic behavior and installation viewing conditions. Its scope should not be generalized into identical requirements for every aircraft or every cabin display. FAA AC 25-11B, Chapters 3 and 5.

Select operating modes separately for each hazard. Maximum brightness may drive thermal loading; another dimming setting may produce more emissions or worse susceptibility. Exercise relevant data links, touch scanning, heaters, fans and display processing. A static logo can conceal a frozen frame. A time-varying pattern, controlled input sequence and synchronized event log provide stronger evidence.

Separate during-exposure, post-exposure and survival criteria. Do not insist on powered operation during a test defined for unpowered survival, and do not accept automatic recovery where the display function requires uninterrupted operation. Any permitted degradation needs a defined duration and consequence consistent with the program’s requirements.

Worked acceptance record — illustrative customer choices

RequirementTeaching acceptance valueMeasurement and timing
Dynamic image remains currentNo unannunciated freeze lasting over 100 msMoving frame counter and synchronized camera or validated capture; define detection resolution
Startup under the agreed cold conditionUsable image within 60 s of power applicationDefined initial soak, valid input and power threshold; record heater and backlight states
Luminance at specified hot conditionAt least 400 cd/m² at the stated patchDefined pattern, brightness setting, viewing axis, stabilization and calibrated instrument
Input validityInvalid input produces the specified indication within 250 msTimestamp the injected invalidity and indication; distinguish processing from sensor latency

These values are invented course examples. A real program derives criteria from its function and safety assessment. A 100 ms interruption may be unacceptable for one function and irrelevant for another. Recovery after a disturbance is not adequate where uninterrupted operation is required.

Measurement uncertainty

Suppose a measured luminance is 405 cd/m² with an expanded uncertainty of 12 cd/m² and the minimum is 400. A simple measured-value rule and a rule requiring measured value minus uncertainty to meet the minimum produce different decisions. Agree the rule before testing. Do not select the favorable rule after seeing the data.

Exercise

Rewrite “display shall work after vibration.” Worked response: identify which functions must operate during vibration, required checks between axes and after exposure, the image sequence and controls exercised, permitted discontinuities, numeric optical limits, physical inspection criteria and the exact configuration. The phrase after vibration cannot silently waive a required during-test function.

  • Sobre
  • Comments (0)
Calificación
0 0

No hay comentarios por ahora

Unirse a este curso
para ser el primero en comentar.

Prev Next

Subscribe to the FPD.DEV newsletter

Get display and embedded engineering articles, Edge AI insights, tool updates and product news by email.

Thanks for registering!

Subscribe

By subscribing, you agree to receive the FPD.DEV newsletter. You can unsubscribe at any time. See our Privacy Policy.


FPD.DEV
The Future of Display & Systems Development

  • Contact Us




  • Privacy Policy

 

 

Póngase en contacto

Operated by Colabmo · Quality, operations & ERP support.


Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2024 Colabmo ​ ​
English (US) Español
Powered by Colabmo
Powered by Colabmo

Essential cookies support website functions. With your permission, Google Analytics measures visits and Microsoft Clarity records masked interactions, heatmaps and session replays on approved public pages. Optional embedded features may also contact their providers. These providers receive usage and device data; Microsoft may use data for its own purposes, including advertising. You can reject optional services and change your choice later. Política de CookiesPrivacy Policy

Allow optional cookies Only essential cookiesManage choices