-
Foundations
-
- Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
-
- Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
-
-
Sensing technologies
-
- Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
-
- Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
-
- Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
-
-
Integration
-
Applications
-
Custom development
11.1 Force sensing, haptics and touchless extensions
Chapter 11 · Sensing technologies
Force sensing, haptics and touchless extensions
Separate position sensing, force confirmation and feedback, and explain their integration tradeoffs.
Narration pending. Explore the chapter slide deck below. Select Play for the animations; this edition has no audio. The narration script and chapter reading follow.
Narration script
Slide 72 of 157 · Force sensing, haptics and touchless extensions
Welcome to chapter 11: Force sensing, haptics and touchless extensions. I'm Diggy Breiling with FPD.DEV, The Future of Display and Systems Development. Our goal is to separate position sensing, force confirmation and feedback, and explain their integration tradeoffs. For help integrating touch and feedback into a custom embedded platform, contact FPD.DEV.
Slide 73 of 157 · Force is an additional measurement
A product can measure applied force using changes in resistance, capacitance, strain or a mechanical sensor arrangement. Some designs infer location from distributed force; others combine force measurement with a separate position sensor. For a simple static panel on supports, total applied normal force is approximately the sum of support reactions after tare. A force centroid can be inferred from force moments under ideal conditions. Preload, mounting friction, multiple contacts and acceleration complicate that model. Our animation is a one-contact teaching model. It illustrates a confirmation threshold, not a universal force-to-coordinate algorithm or a qualified safety function.
Slide 74 of 157 · Haptics is an output
A vibration actuator or piezoelectric element can provide tactile feedback after a recognized input. Feedback timing and strength influence whether the interface feels responsive. The haptic pulse confirms what the software decided; it does not prove that the intended command was selected. Ultraleap also demonstrates mid-air tactile sensation using focused ultrasound. This is a different feedback mechanism, typically paired with a separate way to locate the user's hand. Touchless selection changes interaction geometry and accidental-activation risks. For gloves or vehicle vibration, test whether the user can perceive and distinguish the intended feedback. An actuator that is obvious on a desk may be hard to recognize in service.
Slide 75 of 157 · Deliberate actuation without new confusion
Separate highlight, selection and execution in the user-interface definition. An illustrative sequence is: locate a contact, highlight a target, cross a defined force or confirmation condition, execute, then acknowledge. Specify cancellation and release behavior. Do not add a hard press merely because a sensor supports it. It may increase fatigue or make operation in motion harder. Compare it against a second confirmation step or a tactile physical control for the same task. Validate end-to-end behavior during repeated presses, long holds, interrupted power and missed feedback. Include users with different hand strength and reach.
Slide 76 of 157 · Apply the idea
A haptic click is felt but the commanded system does not change state. Has the command succeeded? Pause here and consider your answer. Not necessarily. The pulse may acknowledge only input recognition. The interface must distinguish touch acceptance, command transmission and confirmed system state.
Slide 77 of 157 · Chapter 11 complete
Complete the chapter exercise and review any open questions. Next is Chapter 12: LCD, OLED, microLED and other display architectures. I'm Diggy Breiling with FPD.DEV, The Future of Display and Systems Development. Thank you for joining me.
Chapter reading
Use the reading Back and Forward buttons to browse the content. Choose another chapter in the course sidebar, or use the chapter PDF and slide deck link below.
Reading 1 of 3
Force is an additional measurement
A product can measure applied force using changes in resistance, capacitance, strain or a mechanical sensor arrangement. Some designs infer location from distributed force; others combine force measurement with a separate position sensor.
For a simple static panel on supports, total applied normal force is approximately the sum of support reactions after tare. A force centroid can be inferred from force moments under ideal conditions. Preload, mounting friction, multiple contacts and acceleration complicate that model.
Our animation is a one-contact teaching model. It illustrates a confirmation threshold, not a universal force-to-coordinate algorithm or a qualified safety function.
Reading 2 of 3
Haptics is an output
A vibration actuator or piezoelectric element can provide tactile feedback after a recognized input. Feedback timing and strength influence whether the interface feels responsive. The haptic pulse confirms what the software decided; it does not prove that the intended command was selected.
Ultraleap also demonstrates mid-air tactile sensation using focused ultrasound. This is a different feedback mechanism, typically paired with a separate way to locate the user's hand. Touchless selection changes interaction geometry and accidental-activation risks.
For gloves or vehicle vibration, test whether the user can perceive and distinguish the intended feedback. An actuator that is obvious on a desk may be hard to recognize in service.
Reading 3 of 3
Deliberate actuation without new confusion
Separate highlight, selection and execution in the user-interface definition. An illustrative sequence is: locate a contact, highlight a target, cross a defined force or confirmation condition, execute, then acknowledge. Specify cancellation and release behavior.
Do not add a hard press merely because a sensor supports it. It may increase fatigue or make operation in motion harder. Compare it against a second confirmation step or a tactile physical control for the same task.
Validate end-to-end behavior during repeated presses, long holds, interrupted power and missed feedback. Include users with different hand strength and reach.
Apply what you learned
A haptic click is felt but the commanded system does not change state. Has the command succeeded?
Suggested answer
Not necessarily. The pulse may acknowledge only input recognition. The interface must distinguish touch acceptance, command transmission and confirmed system state.
References and links
Glossary
- Accuracy
- Closeness of a reported coordinate to a defined reference position.
- Precision
- Repeatability or spread of results under specified conditions.
- Resolution
- Smallest coordinate increment or representable change; not equivalent to accuracy.
- Latency
- Time between explicitly defined input and output events.
- PCAP
- Projected capacitive touch; patterned electrodes sense electrical coupling changes.
- Self-capacitance
- Measurement of an electrode relative to an electrical reference.
- Mutual capacitance
- Measurement of coupling between transmit and receive electrodes.
- Baseline
- Reference measurement used to identify changes associated with touch.
- SNR
- Signal-to-noise ratio; specify the signal, noise measure and conditions.
- SAW
- Surface acoustic wave sensing through controlled propagation on a surface.
- APR
- Acoustic pulse recognition; a touch-generated mechanical response is used to locate contact.
- DST
- Dispersive signal technology; a bending-wave sensing implementation.
- EMR
- Electromagnetic resonance, used by compatible pen digitizers.
- Haptics
- Tactile feedback produced by the system.
- HID
- Human Interface Device class/protocol family; the descriptor defines report interpretation.
- Report descriptor
- Data describing the structure and meaning of HID reports.
- Contact ID
- Identifier used to distinguish and track a contact.
- I2C
- Two-wire synchronous bus; raw I2C communication does not itself implement HID.
- SPI
- Synchronous serial peripheral interface, with device-specific protocol behavior.
- UART
- Asynchronous serial hardware; electrical levels and framing must be specified.
- Optical bonding
- Joining optical layers with a transparent material to manage the interface.
- Parallax
- Apparent relative position shift caused by viewing separated planes from an angle.
- NVIS
- Night Vision Imaging System; pronounce 'en-vis' in this course.
- Qualification
- Evidence against a defined set of requirements for an identified configuration.
- Validation
- Evidence that the system satisfies its intended use.
- Verification
- Evidence of conformance to specified requirements.
- Ghost touch
- Reported contact that does not correspond to an intended physical touch.
- Palm rejection
- Classification or suppression of unintended hand contact.
- On-cell / in-cell
- Touch structures at a display-cell surface / integrated within the display structure; verify supplier construction.
- Touch plane
- Geometric region in which the sensing system detects an object.
FPD.DEV — The Future of Display and Systems Development.
ShadowSense™ is a trademark of Baanto International Ltd. The ShadowSense technology and related intellectual property belong to Baanto. FPD.DEV’s explanatory graphics are original teaching illustrations.
No hay comentarios por ahora