Ir al contenido
FPD.DEV FPD.DEVEl futuro del desarrollo de pantallas y sistemas
  • Servicios
  • Productos
  • Formación
  • Colaboradores
  • Vídeos
  • Programar una consulta gratuita
  • Identificarse
  • 0
  • 0
  • English (US)  Français  Deutsch  Español
FPD.DEV FPD.DEVEl futuro del desarrollo de pantallas y sistemas
  • 0
  • 0
    • Servicios
    • Productos
    • Formación
    • Colaboradores
    • Vídeos
  • English (US)  Français  Deutsch  Español
  • Identificarse
  • Programar una consulta gratuita
  1. Cursos
  2. Touch Panel Technology for LCD and Other Displays
  3. 2.1 The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection
Navegación
Inicio └Touch Panel Technology for LCD and Other Displays └2.1 The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection

Touch Panel Technology for LCD and Other Displays

0 %

Completado

Contenido del curso
  • Foundations
    • 1.1 Welcome: the display shows; the touch system senses
      • Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
    • 2.1 The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection
      • Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
  • Sensing technologies
    • 3.1 Resistive touch: a press becomes a voltage
      • Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
    • 4.1 Surface capacitive: current paths across a sheet
      • Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
    • 5.1 Projected capacitive: electric fields, electrodes and touch maps
      • Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
    • 6.1 Infrared beam grids: locating an interrupted path
    • 7.1 Optical sensing and ShadowSense™: locating shadows
    • 8.1 Surface acoustic wave: listening to a disturbance
    • 9.1 Acoustic pulse and bending-wave sensing
    • 10.1 Pen digitizers: EMR, active pens and passive styluses
    • 11.1 Force sensing, haptics and touchless extensions
  • Integration
    • 12.1 LCD, OLED, microLED and other display architectures
    • 13.1 Optical and mechanical integration
    • 14.1 Controllers, drivers, USB HID and embedded interfaces
    • 15.1 Tuning, diagnostics and meaningful verification
  • Applications
    • 16.1 Commercial and public-facing displays
    • 17.1 Industrial systems: gloves, contamination and uptime
    • 18.1 Aerospace, avionics and NVIS
    • 19.1 Military displays and mission environments
    • 20.1 Ground transport: road, rail and working vehicles
  • Custom development
    • 21.1 Custom products with FPD.DEV and Diggy Breiling
    • 22.1 Capstone: specify, compare and verify

2.1 The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection

Anterior Siguiente
Fullscreen Share

Chapter 2 · Foundations

The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection

Build a shortlist from the operating conditions instead of choosing a universal winner.

Narration script

Slide 8 of 157 · The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection

Welcome to chapter 2: The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection. I'm Diggy Breiling, founder of FPD.DEV, The Future of Display and Systems Development. Our goal is to build a shortlist from the operating conditions instead of choosing a universal winner.

Slide 9 of 157 · A useful first shortlist

Resistive touch detects a physical press; it accepts many glove and stylus types but needs force and a deformable sensing structure. Projected capacitive, or PCAP, detects an electrical field change; it supports a clean glass front and rich multitouch, with tuning needed for gloves, water and electrical noise. Infrared detects interrupted light paths; it can keep sensing electrodes out of the view but needs optical paths around the perimeter. Surface acoustic wave, or SAW, detects changes to waves travelling along glass. Optical camera and shadow systems infer position from light patterns. Pen digitizers add a specialized precision tool. Force sensing and haptics add information or feedback; neither automatically supplies a complete finger-touch system.

Slide 10 of 157 · Compare conditions, not slogans (1)

Resistive touch is useful when the user may wear gloves or use a passive tool. Check the required press force, surface wear, optical performance and number of simultaneous contacts. Surface capacitive is a glass-based option often found in legacy equipment; conductive coupling, single-touch operation and replacement availability matter. Projected capacitive, or PCAP, supports a flush glass front and multitouch. Its performance still depends on sufficient signal margin through the actual cover and glove, with the expected water and electrical noise.

Slide 11 of 157 · Compare conditions, not slogans (2)

An infrared grid can cover a large area without requiring an electrically conductive touch. But the object must be large enough and block enough infrared light to be detected. Test sunlight, blocked paths and the height of the sensing plane above the glass. Camera and shadow systems combine optical views; their geometry and contamination still matter. Surface acoustic wave, or SAW, offers a glass surface and light touch. Water and other sound-absorbing material can disturb its waves, so edge construction and the operating environment are important.

Slide 12 of 157 · Compare conditions, not slogans (3)

Pen digitizers and force sensing serve different needs. A compatible pen system can support precise writing and drawing, but the pen, digitizer and host must work together. Force sensing measures how hard the user presses and can support deliberate confirmation. It does not automatically identify every contact position; that depends on the sensing arrangement. Haptics is feedback to the user, not a position measurement.

Slide 13 of 157 · Tradeoffs become requirements

Begin with exclusion criteria: a mandatory glove, a forbidden raised bezel, a required stylus, or an unacceptable emission may eliminate a candidate. Then compare the survivors using measured evidence and lifecycle cost: sensor, controller, glass, integration, tooling, qualification, service and replacement. A weighted score is useful only after mandatory requirements pass. Do not let several convenient features outweigh a failed critical requirement. Record unknowns as unknowns, not average scores. Compare matched configurations. A lab demo on thin glass and a rugged assembly with a heater, thick cover and long harness are different systems. Request test conditions with any claimed accuracy, sunlight immunity or wet-glove performance.

Slide 14 of 157 · Apply the idea

Choose two candidates for a wet outdoor kiosk with gloves. Name the evidence that would decide between them. Pause here and consider your answer. A tuned PCAP assembly and an optical/IR assembly are plausible candidates. Compare the actual gloves, water film and droplets, solar incidence, edge performance, false touches, cleaning and mechanical envelope. Resistive may also fit if the interaction and durability requirements allow.

Slide 15 of 157 · Chapter 2 complete

For help turning your requirements into a custom display, contact FPD.DEV. These are living courses. Enrolled learners will typically receive a notification when chapter content is updated, so please sign in and enroll in the course. Next is Chapter 3: Resistive touch: a press becomes a voltage. I'm Diggy Breiling, founder of FPD.DEV, The Future of Display and Systems Development. Thank you for joining me.

Chapter reading

Use Back and Forward to browse without interrupting the video. Choose another chapter in the course sidebar. Use the chapter PDF and animated slide deck below.

Open animated slide deck

Chapter PDF DownloadGlossaryReferences and links

Reading 1 of 3

A useful first shortlist

Resistive touch detects a physical press; it accepts many glove and stylus types but needs force and a deformable sensing structure. Projected capacitive, or PCAP, detects an electrical field change; it supports a clean glass front and rich multitouch, with tuning needed for gloves, water and electrical noise. Infrared detects interrupted light paths; it can keep sensing electrodes out of the view but needs optical paths around the perimeter.

Surface acoustic wave, or SAW, detects changes to waves travelling along glass. Optical camera and shadow systems infer position from light patterns. Pen digitizers add a specialized precision tool. Force sensing and haptics add information or feedback; neither automatically supplies a complete finger-touch system.

Reading 2 of 3

Compare conditions, not slogans

FamilyPrimary attractionMain design question
ResistiveGloves and passive toolsForce, wear, optical stack and required contact count
Surface capacitiveSimple glass-based legacy solutionConductive coupling, single-touch needs and lifecycle
PCAPFlush glass, multitouchSignal margin through the actual cover and glove
IR gridLarge areas; no conductive touch requiredObject size, IR blocking, sunlight and bezel geometry
Optical/shadowPosition from multiple optical viewsGeometry, contamination and emitter interactions
SAWGlass surface and light touchAcoustic absorption and edge construction
Pen digitizersPrecise writing and drawingCompatible pen, protocol and display mapping
Force sensingApplied force or deliberate confirmationMounting, calibration and position-sensing method

IR sensing does not require electrical conductivity, but the object must sufficiently block the infrared paths and meet the system's minimum detection size. Pen input, force measurement and haptic feedback are distinct functions; choose the combination the task requires.

Reading 3 of 3

Tradeoffs become requirements

Begin with exclusion criteria: a mandatory glove, a forbidden raised bezel, a required stylus, or an unacceptable emission may eliminate a candidate. Then compare the survivors using measured evidence and lifecycle cost: sensor, controller, glass, integration, tooling, qualification, service and replacement.

A weighted score is useful only after mandatory requirements pass. Do not let several convenient features outweigh a failed critical requirement. Record unknowns as unknowns, not average scores.

Compare matched configurations. A lab demo on thin glass and a rugged assembly with a heater, thick cover and long harness are different systems. Request test conditions with any claimed accuracy, sunlight immunity or wet-glove performance.

The simple comparison: benefits, compromises and selection — explanatory illustration
Original FPD.DEV teaching illustration; not measured product performance.

Apply what you learned

Choose two candidates for a wet outdoor kiosk with gloves. Name the evidence that would decide between them.

Suggested answer

A tuned PCAP assembly and an optical/IR assembly are plausible candidates. Compare the actual gloves, water film and droplets, solar incidence, edge performance, false touches, cleaning and mechanical envelope. Resistive may also fit if the interaction and durability requirements allow.

A person using a touch kiosk
A user operates a prototype electronic-voting kiosk. Notice the inclined screen and standing reach: enclosure geometry and target placement are part of the touch interface.
Maurizio Napolitano from Trento, Italy · CC BY 2.0 · Source · Unmodified photograph; scaled for display

References and links

  • Elo: AccuTouch five-wire resistive operation
  • Microchip: Moisture tolerance
  • Microchip: Automotive touchscreen controllers: gloves, moisture and signal processing
  • Elo: Infrared beam-grid operation
  • Elo: IntelliTouch/SecureTouch surface acoustic wave operation
  • Wacom: EMR and active electrostatic pen technologies
  • Ultraleap: Focused-ultrasound haptics
  • IRTOUCH Systems: E/E2/IX Series infrared touchscreen: IR-opaque activation objects and minimum size
Glossary
Accuracy
Closeness of a reported coordinate to a defined reference position.
Precision
Repeatability or spread of results under specified conditions.
Resolution
Smallest coordinate increment or representable change; not equivalent to accuracy.
Latency
Time between explicitly defined input and output events.
PCAP
Projected capacitive touch; patterned electrodes sense electrical coupling changes.
Self-capacitance
Measurement of an electrode relative to an electrical reference.
Mutual capacitance
Measurement of coupling between transmit and receive electrodes.
Baseline
Reference measurement used to identify changes associated with touch.
SNR
Signal-to-noise ratio; specify the signal, noise measure and conditions.
SAW
Surface acoustic wave sensing through controlled propagation on a surface.
APR
Acoustic pulse recognition; a touch-generated mechanical response is used to locate contact.
DST
Dispersive signal technology; a bending-wave sensing implementation.
EMR
Electromagnetic resonance, used by compatible pen digitizers.
Haptics
Tactile feedback produced by the system.
HID
Human Interface Device class/protocol family; the descriptor defines report interpretation.
Report descriptor
Data describing the structure and meaning of HID reports.
Contact ID
Identifier used to distinguish and track a contact.
I2C
Two-wire synchronous bus; raw I2C communication does not itself implement HID.
SPI
Synchronous serial peripheral interface, with device-specific protocol behavior.
UART
Asynchronous serial hardware; electrical levels and framing must be specified.
Optical bonding
Joining optical layers with a transparent material to manage the interface.
Parallax
Apparent relative position shift caused by viewing separated planes from an angle.
NVIS
Night Vision Imaging System; pronounce 'en-vis' in this course.
Qualification
Evidence against a defined set of requirements for an identified configuration.
Validation
Evidence that the system satisfies its intended use.
Verification
Evidence of conformance to specified requirements.
Ghost touch
Reported contact that does not correspond to an intended physical touch.
Palm rejection
Classification or suppression of unintended hand contact.
On-cell / in-cell
Touch structures at a display-cell surface / integrated within the display structure; verify supplier construction.
Touch plane
Geometric region in which the sensing system detects an object.

FPD.DEV — The Future of Display and Systems Development.

ShadowSense™ is a trademark of Baanto International Ltd. The ShadowSense technology and related intellectual property belong to Baanto. FPD.DEV’s explanatory graphics are original teaching illustrations.

  • Sobre
  • Comments (0)
Calificación
0 0

No hay comentarios por ahora

Unirse a este curso
para ser el primero en comentar.

Recursos adicionales
Unirse a este curso para acceder a recursos
Prev Next

Ingeniería de pantallas centrada en LCD Trabajamos principalmente con pantallas LCD, incluidas IPS, FFS, VA y otras tecnologías, con mejoras ópticas, integración táctil, retroiluminación y electrónica de soporte. También evaluamos otras tecnologías de visualización cuando se adaptan a la aplicación.

Explorar la óptica LCD con OpticalOracle™

Suscríbase al boletín de FPD.DEV

Reciba por correo electrónico artículos sobre ingeniería de pantallas y sistemas embebidos, información sobre IA en el borde, actualizaciones de herramientas y novedades de productos.

Thanks for registering!

Suscribirse

Al suscribirse, acepta recibir el boletín de FPD.DEV. Puede darse de baja en cualquier momento. Consulte nuestra Política de privacidad.


FPD.DEV
El futuro del desarrollo de pantallas y sistemas

  • Contáctenos




  • Política de privacidad

 

 

Contáctenos

Operado por Colabmo · Calidad, operaciones y Soporte ERP.


Política de cookies

Copyright © 2026 Colabmo
Powered by Colabmo
Con tecnología de Colabmo

Essential cookies support website functions. With your permission, Google Analytics measures visits and Microsoft Clarity records masked interactions, heatmaps and session replays on approved public pages. Optional embedded features may also contact their providers. These providers receive usage and device data; Microsoft may use data for its own purposes, including advertising. You can reject optional services and change your choice later. Política de CookiesPrivacy Policy

Allow optional cookies Only essential cookiesManage choices